https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360303 The appellant, engaged in manufacturing aluminum, faced a challenge regarding cenvat credit denial due to invoices not in their name but as 'care of' a job worker. The court found that despite the initial dispute, the appellant was entitled to credit as the goods were received and utilized by them. The rectification of invoices with the appellant's name was justified, leading to the appeal being allowed, the impugned order set aside, and consequential relief granted to the appellant. en-us Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 May 2018 07:12:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360303 The appellant, engaged in manufacturing aluminum, faced a challenge regarding cenvat credit denial due to invoices not in their name but as 'care of' a job worker. The court found that despite the initial dispute, the appellant was entitled to credit as the goods were received and utilized by them. The rectification of invoices with the appellant's name was justified, leading to the appeal being allowed, the impugned order set aside, and consequential relief granted to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360303