<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 861 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360297</link>
    <description>The Appeals filed by the Revenue regarding the refund of excess excise duty paid on the clearance of finished goods were rejected by the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal found no reason to deviate from a previous decision in favor of the appellant on the same issue, which had set a precedent. The impugned order was upheld, and no interference was deemed necessary based on the established legal position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 07:12:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 861 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360297</link>
      <description>The Appeals filed by the Revenue regarding the refund of excess excise duty paid on the clearance of finished goods were rejected by the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal found no reason to deviate from a previous decision in favor of the appellant on the same issue, which had set a precedent. The impugned order was upheld, and no interference was deemed necessary based on the established legal position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>