<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (9) TMI 122 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272710</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the irrevocability of both the general and special powers of attorney under Section 202 of the Contract Act. The respondent was not obligated to pay interest on the unpaid purchase money as possession of the property had not been delivered. The cross-objection was allowed, resulting in the removal of the direction for payment of interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 15:33:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (9) TMI 122 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272710</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the irrevocability of both the general and special powers of attorney under Section 202 of the Contract Act. The respondent was not obligated to pay interest on the unpaid purchase money as possession of the property had not been delivered. The cross-objection was allowed, resulting in the removal of the direction for payment of interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>