https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272708 The Court upheld the ad interim injunction granted by the Court of Appeal in a suit for injunction involving disputed property owned by four brothers. The defendant's challenge based on procedural grounds was rejected, emphasizing the need for reasons behind granting injunctions. The Court justified the urgency for the interim order to protect the privacy rights of undivided family members from external interference. It affirmed the protection of co-sharers under Section 44 of the Transfer of Property Act and dismissed the revision application, emphasizing no prejudice to the trial court's independent findings. en-us Fri, 22 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 May 2018 15:23:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272708 The Court upheld the ad interim injunction granted by the Court of Appeal in a suit for injunction involving disputed property owned by four brothers. The defendant's challenge based on procedural grounds was rejected, emphasizing the need for reasons behind granting injunctions. The Court justified the urgency for the interim order to protect the privacy rights of undivided family members from external interference. It affirmed the protection of co-sharers under Section 44 of the Transfer of Property Act and dismissed the revision application, emphasizing no prejudice to the trial court's independent findings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272708