https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272705 The appeal against the trial court's decree for rendition of accounts and injunction was dismissed. The defendants' attempt to set aside the ex parte order under Order 9, Rule 13, C.P.C. was rejected. The defendants' plea for remand was denied due to inadequate pleadings. The first defendant claimed ownership under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, but the court found insufficient evidence and lack of proper pleadings to support this claim. The court emphasized the need for written contracts and possession in part performance, ultimately ruling that the appeal lacked the necessary legal basis for invoking Section 53A. en-us Wed, 22 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 May 2018 15:08:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272705 The appeal against the trial court's decree for rendition of accounts and injunction was dismissed. The defendants' attempt to set aside the ex parte order under Order 9, Rule 13, C.P.C. was rejected. The defendants' plea for remand was denied due to inadequate pleadings. The first defendant claimed ownership under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, but the court found insufficient evidence and lack of proper pleadings to support this claim. The court emphasized the need for written contracts and possession in part performance, ultimately ruling that the appeal lacked the necessary legal basis for invoking Section 53A. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272705