https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272703 The petition for stay of ejectment proceedings under section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code was dismissed by the court. The court held that the matters in the specific performance and ejectment suits were distinct, and the court handling the specific performance suit had not stayed the ejectment proceedings. The court also rejected the consolidation of suits, emphasizing that a mere agreement to sell does not confer the right to occupy the property. The court clarified that the jurisdiction to stay eviction lies with the court handling the specific performance suit. Additionally, the court affirmed the termination of the landlord-tenant relationship due to the absence of a registered agreement. The petition was dismissed, and the stay on ejectment proceedings was lifted. en-us Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 May 2018 14:36:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272703 The petition for stay of ejectment proceedings under section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code was dismissed by the court. The court held that the matters in the specific performance and ejectment suits were distinct, and the court handling the specific performance suit had not stayed the ejectment proceedings. The court also rejected the consolidation of suits, emphasizing that a mere agreement to sell does not confer the right to occupy the property. The court clarified that the jurisdiction to stay eviction lies with the court handling the specific performance suit. Additionally, the court affirmed the termination of the landlord-tenant relationship due to the absence of a registered agreement. The petition was dismissed, and the stay on ejectment proceedings was lifted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272703