<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 59 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13004</link>
    <description>Section 80J relief for an industrial undertaking was to be computed for the full assessment year, even if the unit worked only for part of that year, rather than being restricted to a pro rata basis. The settled position applied by the High Court favoured the assessee on the period for which the deduction could be worked out. Actual computation still depended on the profits attributable to the unit and any question of carry forward, where relevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:14:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 59 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13004</link>
      <description>Section 80J relief for an industrial undertaking was to be computed for the full assessment year, even if the unit worked only for part of that year, rather than being restricted to a pro rata basis. The settled position applied by the High Court favoured the assessee on the period for which the deduction could be worked out. Actual computation still depended on the profits attributable to the unit and any question of carry forward, where relevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>