https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360282 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the re-determined value of imported goods, penalties, and confiscation, ruling in favor of the appellants. The Tribunal found no evidence to support the re-determination of the assessable value without proof of mis-declaration. It concluded that the adjudged demands against the appellants were not sustainable due to lack of substantiated evidence, ultimately allowing the appeals and favoring the appellants based on compliance with payment procedures. en-us Tue, 01 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 May 2018 12:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360282 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the re-determined value of imported goods, penalties, and confiscation, ruling in favor of the appellants. The Tribunal found no evidence to support the re-determination of the assessable value without proof of mis-declaration. It concluded that the adjudged demands against the appellants were not sustainable due to lack of substantiated evidence, ultimately allowing the appeals and favoring the appellants based on compliance with payment procedures. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 01 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360282