<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 842 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360278</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal on the grounds of time bar as the delay exceeded the permissible limit set by the Supreme Court. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of not receiving the original order timely, the evidence of dispatch provided by the Customs Department supported the delay in filing the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory time limits for filing appeals, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent allowing the Commissioner to condone delays only up to a specified period, which was exceeded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 06:14:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 842 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360278</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal on the grounds of time bar as the delay exceeded the permissible limit set by the Supreme Court. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of not receiving the original order timely, the evidence of dispatch provided by the Customs Department supported the delay in filing the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory time limits for filing appeals, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent allowing the Commissioner to condone delays only up to a specified period, which was exceeded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>