<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 840 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360276</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal concerning jurisdiction under Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962, as it lacked the authority to decide claims related to drawback. The specific bar under Section 129A restricts the Tribunal from entertaining such claims, leaving the Revisionary Authority with the power to adjudicate on such matters. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed due to the lack of jurisdiction in deciding the drawback claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 06:14:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 840 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360276</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal concerning jurisdiction under Section 129A of the Customs Act, 1962, as it lacked the authority to decide claims related to drawback. The specific bar under Section 129A restricts the Tribunal from entertaining such claims, leaving the Revisionary Authority with the power to adjudicate on such matters. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed due to the lack of jurisdiction in deciding the drawback claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>