<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 839 - TELANGANA &amp; ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360275</link>
    <description>The appellate court affirmed the trial court&#039;s judgment and decree, dismissing the appeal with costs. The court emphasized the defendant&#039;s admission of executing the promissory note and lack of credible evidence to counter the presumption of consideration, justifying the decree in favor of the plaintiff. The miscellaneous petitions pending in the appeal were also closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 06:14:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 839 - TELANGANA &amp; ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360275</link>
      <description>The appellate court affirmed the trial court&#039;s judgment and decree, dismissing the appeal with costs. The court emphasized the defendant&#039;s admission of executing the promissory note and lack of credible evidence to counter the presumption of consideration, justifying the decree in favor of the plaintiff. The miscellaneous petitions pending in the appeal were also closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>