https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360268 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the demand for service tax on equipment under the category of renting out immovable property. The Tribunal found that there were two distinct agreements for renting property and equipment, with service tax paid on renting equipment only from a specific date, and no justification for raising the service tax demand on equipment under the category of renting out immovable property. The decision was supported by a similar case reference, leading to the conclusion that the impugned order had no basis for sustenance. en-us Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 May 2018 06:13:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360268 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the demand for service tax on equipment under the category of renting out immovable property. The Tribunal found that there were two distinct agreements for renting property and equipment, with service tax paid on renting equipment only from a specific date, and no justification for raising the service tax demand on equipment under the category of renting out immovable property. The decision was supported by a similar case reference, leading to the conclusion that the impugned order had no basis for sustenance. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 13 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360268