https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360263 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and COD application, ruling that the date of dispatch should be considered as the date of communication of the impugned order. The appellant failed to provide evidence of receiving the order on a later date, and the Tribunal emphasized compliance with statutory provisions regarding service via registered post. The decision was based on established legal principles, highlighting the burden of proof on the appellant and the necessity of timely compliance with the law. en-us Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 May 2018 06:13:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360263 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and COD application, ruling that the date of dispatch should be considered as the date of communication of the impugned order. The appellant failed to provide evidence of receiving the order on a later date, and the Tribunal emphasized compliance with statutory provisions regarding service via registered post. The decision was based on established legal principles, highlighting the burden of proof on the appellant and the necessity of timely compliance with the law. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360263