https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360250 The appeal challenged the confirmation of duty demand, interest, and penalty totaling Rs. 30,09,782, with an additional penalty of Rs. 5,00,000 imposed on the Director. The case revolved around allegations of clandestine removal based on third-party records, particularly those of M/s Monu Steels. The court emphasized the need for concrete evidence of clandestine activities beyond third-party documents. A penalty on M/s Kailash Traders for supplying unaccounted raw material was also overturned due to insufficient proof linking it to the alleged activities. Ultimately, the appeals were allowed, granting relief to the appellant based on the evaluation of evidence and legal principles. en-us Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 May 2018 06:13:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360250 The appeal challenged the confirmation of duty demand, interest, and penalty totaling Rs. 30,09,782, with an additional penalty of Rs. 5,00,000 imposed on the Director. The case revolved around allegations of clandestine removal based on third-party records, particularly those of M/s Monu Steels. The court emphasized the need for concrete evidence of clandestine activities beyond third-party documents. A penalty on M/s Kailash Traders for supplying unaccounted raw material was also overturned due to insufficient proof linking it to the alleged activities. Ultimately, the appeals were allowed, granting relief to the appellant based on the evaluation of evidence and legal principles. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360250