https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272691 The court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioner must address the RTI application filed by respondent No.4 and cannot claim exemption from the obligations under the RTI Act. The challenge to the proviso to Section 7(5) was also rejected, emphasizing the importance of maintaining transparency and accountability as intended by the RTI Act. The judgment concluded by stating that the petition lacked merit and was therefore dismissed, with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 May 2018 06:12:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272691 The court dismissed the petition, holding that the petitioner must address the RTI application filed by respondent No.4 and cannot claim exemption from the obligations under the RTI Act. The challenge to the proviso to Section 7(5) was also rejected, emphasizing the importance of maintaining transparency and accountability as intended by the RTI Act. The judgment concluded by stating that the petition lacked merit and was therefore dismissed, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272691