<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1647 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272693</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and deleting the addition of Rs. 4,05,87,159 for long-term capital gains tax. It emphasized that without a registered Joint Development Agreement (JDA), it did not fall under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, thus no transfer of land occurred, relieving the assessee from the liability of capital gains tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 06:12:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1647 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272693</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and deleting the addition of Rs. 4,05,87,159 for long-term capital gains tax. It emphasized that without a registered Joint Development Agreement (JDA), it did not fall under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, thus no transfer of land occurred, relieving the assessee from the liability of capital gains tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>