<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1726 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272695</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh, admitted the petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, filed by an operational creditor against a corporate debtor. The court declared a moratorium to prevent actions against the debtor, ensuring continuity of essential goods/services. The petitioner fulfilled all legal requirements, leading to the admission of the petition and the appointment of an Interim Insolvency Resolution Professional. The debtor&#039;s outstanding debt, confirmed by the High Court of Delhi, and compliance with Section 8 and 9 of the Code were crucial in the court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 06:12:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1726 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272695</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh, admitted the petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, filed by an operational creditor against a corporate debtor. The court declared a moratorium to prevent actions against the debtor, ensuring continuity of essential goods/services. The petitioner fulfilled all legal requirements, leading to the admission of the petition and the appointment of an Interim Insolvency Resolution Professional. The debtor&#039;s outstanding debt, confirmed by the High Court of Delhi, and compliance with Section 8 and 9 of the Code were crucial in the court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>