<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 807 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360243</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta upheld the addition of share capital amounting to Rs. 46,72,000 in the appellant&#039;s hands under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found discrepancies in shareholder addresses, shared addresses near the appellant&#039;s office, and doubts regarding the genuineness of transactions. Despite the appellant&#039;s submissions, the Appellate Tribunal did not find any flaws in the assessment. The appellant failed to provide balance-sheets and relied on suspicious affidavits, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with costs imposed. The judgment emphasizes the need to substantiate transactions and address doubts to prevent additions under Section 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2018 08:44:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 807 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360243</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta upheld the addition of share capital amounting to Rs. 46,72,000 in the appellant&#039;s hands under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found discrepancies in shareholder addresses, shared addresses near the appellant&#039;s office, and doubts regarding the genuineness of transactions. Despite the appellant&#039;s submissions, the Appellate Tribunal did not find any flaws in the assessment. The appellant failed to provide balance-sheets and relied on suspicious affidavits, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with costs imposed. The judgment emphasizes the need to substantiate transactions and address doubts to prevent additions under Section 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>