https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360238 The Tribunal partly dismissed and partly allowed the Revenue's appeal for statistical purposes. The deletions made by the CIT(A) were largely upheld, with a directive for the AO to verify specific project expenses. The additions under various sections of the IT Act were deleted based on lack of proper verification and consideration of relevant evidence, leading to the Tribunal affirming the CIT(A)'s decisions in most instances. en-us Thu, 10 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Aug 2022 15:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360238 The Tribunal partly dismissed and partly allowed the Revenue's appeal for statistical purposes. The deletions made by the CIT(A) were largely upheld, with a directive for the AO to verify specific project expenses. The additions under various sections of the IT Act were deleted based on lack of proper verification and consideration of relevant evidence, leading to the Tribunal affirming the CIT(A)'s decisions in most instances. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 10 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360238