<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 788 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360224</link>
    <description>A writ petition was held not maintainable to quash a show cause notice proposing service tax on renting of immovable property because the dispute depended on contested facts and the applicability of the Mega Exemption Notification. The Court noted that the notice related to renting of immovable property, not the excavation work relied on by the petitioner, and that entitlement to exemption under clause 13 of Notification No. 25/2012-Service Tax had to be established before the statutory authority. The petitioner was therefore required to file a reply and participate in adjudication rather than seek threshold interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 13:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 788 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360224</link>
      <description>A writ petition was held not maintainable to quash a show cause notice proposing service tax on renting of immovable property because the dispute depended on contested facts and the applicability of the Mega Exemption Notification. The Court noted that the notice related to renting of immovable property, not the excavation work relied on by the petitioner, and that entitlement to exemption under clause 13 of Notification No. 25/2012-Service Tax had to be established before the statutory authority. The petitioner was therefore required to file a reply and participate in adjudication rather than seek threshold interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>