<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 778 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360214</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for reversal of cenvat credit for trading activities under Rule 6(3)(i), citing precedents and lack of evidence. Additionally, the demand for reversal on waste and scrap clearance was dismissed as it did not arise during the manufacturing process. The matter was remanded for verification of the correctness of the reversals carried out on inputs and input services post-01.04.2015, ultimately resulting in the impugned order being set aside and the appeals disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2018 08:43:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=520015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 778 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360214</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for reversal of cenvat credit for trading activities under Rule 6(3)(i), citing precedents and lack of evidence. Additionally, the demand for reversal on waste and scrap clearance was dismissed as it did not arise during the manufacturing process. The matter was remanded for verification of the correctness of the reversals carried out on inputs and input services post-01.04.2015, ultimately resulting in the impugned order being set aside and the appeals disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>