https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360210 The impugned order denying cenvat credit due to the head office not being registered as an Input Service Distributor (ISD) was set aside by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing a decision of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court that contradicted its previous decision. As the issue had been settled by the Gujarat High Court and followed by the Tribunal, both appeals were allowed with consequential relief. en-us Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 May 2018 08:43:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360210 The impugned order denying cenvat credit due to the head office not being registered as an Input Service Distributor (ISD) was set aside by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing a decision of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court that contradicted its previous decision. As the issue had been settled by the Gujarat High Court and followed by the Tribunal, both appeals were allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360210