https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360206 Exported business auxiliary service value could not be finally included in the Rule 6 Cenvat credit computation without first determining the applicability of Rule 6(7), which excludes exported services from the calculation. Because the factual basis for applying the formula had not been properly examined, the original authority was directed to re-evaluate the computation. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh fact finding on the exclusion of exported service value. en-us Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 May 2018 08:42:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360206 Exported business auxiliary service value could not be finally included in the Rule 6 Cenvat credit computation without first determining the applicability of Rule 6(7), which excludes exported services from the calculation. Because the factual basis for applying the formula had not been properly examined, the original authority was directed to re-evaluate the computation. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh fact finding on the exclusion of exported service value. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360206