<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 54 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12990</link>
    <description>Fresh penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) were not permissible for the same assessment year after earlier proceedings had been dropped on the basis of voluntary disclosure and that order had attained finality. The Court held that, once the competent authority had exercised its discretion and closed the original penalty matter on identical facts, the Revenue could not reopen the issue years later by initiating a second round of proceedings. The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:51:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 54 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12990</link>
      <description>Fresh penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) were not permissible for the same assessment year after earlier proceedings had been dropped on the basis of voluntary disclosure and that order had attained finality. The Court held that, once the competent authority had exercised its discretion and closed the original penalty matter on identical facts, the Revenue could not reopen the issue years later by initiating a second round of proceedings. The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>