<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1485 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272678</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the case for fresh consideration regarding individual liability and the necessity of supplying relied-upon documents was upheld. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing a fair opportunity for the respondents to present their case. The dismissal of all Tax Appeals was based on the similarity of facts with previous orders, leading to the conclusion that the appeals lacked merit and were therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 14:41:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1485 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272678</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the case for fresh consideration regarding individual liability and the necessity of supplying relied-upon documents was upheld. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing a fair opportunity for the respondents to present their case. The dismissal of all Tax Appeals was based on the similarity of facts with previous orders, leading to the conclusion that the appeals lacked merit and were therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>