<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 762 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360198</link>
    <description>The document addresses whether an entertainment tax incentive scheme continued after the commencement of GST and the repeal of the earlier entertainment tax regime. It records that the Allahabad High Court directed filing of the counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit, and listed the petition for admission and final disposal in July 2018. No substantive determination on the continuation of the incentive scheme is stated in the text.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 762 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360198</link>
      <description>The document addresses whether an entertainment tax incentive scheme continued after the commencement of GST and the repeal of the earlier entertainment tax regime. It records that the Allahabad High Court directed filing of the counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit, and listed the petition for admission and final disposal in July 2018. No substantive determination on the continuation of the incentive scheme is stated in the text.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>