https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272677 Compensation for requisitioned property under Section 8 of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 is a recurring rental equivalent, so the claimant is not barred from seeking different rates for different periods where the requisition continues. The Act allows fair compensation to be assessed on the basis of evidence of reasonable rent, unlike the Land Acquisition Act's more restrictive approach to earlier assertions. On the evidence, rising local rents and the municipal annual letting value supported fixation at Rs. 1,500 per month from 1-4-1961, and the later reduction in revision did not displace that valuation. en-us Thu, 18 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 May 2018 12:27:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272677 Compensation for requisitioned property under Section 8 of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 is a recurring rental equivalent, so the claimant is not barred from seeking different rates for different periods where the requisition continues. The Act allows fair compensation to be assessed on the basis of evidence of reasonable rent, unlike the Land Acquisition Act's more restrictive approach to earlier assertions. On the evidence, rising local rents and the municipal annual letting value supported fixation at Rs. 1,500 per month from 1-4-1961, and the later reduction in revision did not displace that valuation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272677