<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 742 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360178</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the show cause notice defective as it did not specify whether the penalty was for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. As a result, the imposition of penalty and its confirmation were deemed unsustainable, leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 08:38:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 742 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360178</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found the show cause notice defective as it did not specify whether the penalty was for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. As a result, the imposition of penalty and its confirmation were deemed unsustainable, leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>