<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 741 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360177</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found the penalty notice issued by the Assessing Officer lacking specificity, contravening legal precedents requiring clear identification of the charge for which the penalty is imposed. Emphasizing the importance of precise penalty notices, the tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, deleting the penalty and deeming other grounds moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 08:38:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 741 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360177</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found the penalty notice issued by the Assessing Officer lacking specificity, contravening legal precedents requiring clear identification of the charge for which the penalty is imposed. Emphasizing the importance of precise penalty notices, the tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, deleting the penalty and deeming other grounds moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>