<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 738 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360174</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the re-opening of assessment to be legally invalid as no additions were made by the Assessing Officer regarding the transactions prompting reassessment. Relying on precedent, all additions in the reassessment were deemed invalid and ordered to be deleted. The Tribunal quashed the assessment order, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, and allowed the appeal by the assessee. The order was pronounced on 1.5.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 08:38:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 738 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360174</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the re-opening of assessment to be legally invalid as no additions were made by the Assessing Officer regarding the transactions prompting reassessment. Relying on precedent, all additions in the reassessment were deemed invalid and ordered to be deleted. The Tribunal quashed the assessment order, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, and allowed the appeal by the assessee. The order was pronounced on 1.5.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>