<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 736 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360172</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to reject an application under Section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956, transferred to it under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, based on limitation grounds. Emphasizing the importance of the Doctrine of Limitation and Prescription, the Tribunal clarified that while the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to initiating the corporate insolvency resolution process, delays in filing applications under Sections 7 or 9 of the I&amp;amp;B Code must be justified to avoid stale claims triggering the process. The case was remitted back for reconsideration with instructions to ensure compliance with relevant rules and procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 736 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360172</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to reject an application under Section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956, transferred to it under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, based on limitation grounds. Emphasizing the importance of the Doctrine of Limitation and Prescription, the Tribunal clarified that while the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to initiating the corporate insolvency resolution process, delays in filing applications under Sections 7 or 9 of the I&amp;amp;B Code must be justified to avoid stale claims triggering the process. The case was remitted back for reconsideration with instructions to ensure compliance with relevant rules and procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>