https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360168 The tribunal upheld the duty demand uncontested by the appellant and modified the redemption fine and personal penalty amounts. The judgment emphasized compliance with re-export obligations under customs notifications and penalized the appellant for diverting goods without genuine intent to fulfill export requirements. The redemption fine was reduced to &8377; 4 lakhs, and the personal penalty to &8377; 6 lakhs, striking a balance between penalty imposition and the circumstances of the case. en-us Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360168 The tribunal upheld the duty demand uncontested by the appellant and modified the redemption fine and personal penalty amounts. The judgment emphasized compliance with re-export obligations under customs notifications and penalized the appellant for diverting goods without genuine intent to fulfill export requirements. The redemption fine was reduced to &8377; 4 lakhs, and the personal penalty to &8377; 6 lakhs, striking a balance between penalty imposition and the circumstances of the case. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360168