https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360160 An order refusing handwriting examination of a cheque and related agreement was held not to be merely interlocutory because it conclusively affected a subordinate matter integral to the accused's defence. A request for expert opinion on disputed documents was a step in aid of defence, and denial of that request substantially prejudiced the accused's right to defend the complaint. On that basis, revision under Section 397 CrPC was maintainable, the contrary view on maintainability was set aside, and the revision was directed to be decided on merits. en-us Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 May 2018 08:15:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360160 An order refusing handwriting examination of a cheque and related agreement was held not to be merely interlocutory because it conclusively affected a subordinate matter integral to the accused's defence. A request for expert opinion on disputed documents was a step in aid of defence, and denial of that request substantially prejudiced the accused's right to defend the complaint. On that basis, revision under Section 397 CrPC was maintainable, the contrary view on maintainability was set aside, and the revision was directed to be decided on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360160