<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 723 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360159</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for a re-examination of the appellant&#039;s activities and contracts with banks/NBFCs to determine liability under the BAS category. The decision stressed the significance of scrutinizing transactional documents for precise classification and rational tax assessment, in line with guidelines from a previous Larger Bench decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 08:10:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 723 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360159</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for a re-examination of the appellant&#039;s activities and contracts with banks/NBFCs to determine liability under the BAS category. The decision stressed the significance of scrutinizing transactional documents for precise classification and rational tax assessment, in line with guidelines from a previous Larger Bench decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>