https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360158 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a finance broker, in a case concerning the interpretation of taxable business auxiliary service. The Tribunal held that the appellant's activities did not meet the criteria for business auxiliary service as they did not act as an agency or commission agent and the consideration received was not linked to the sale of a product or service. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was found not liable for service tax. en-us Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 May 2018 08:10:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360158 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a finance broker, in a case concerning the interpretation of taxable business auxiliary service. The Tribunal held that the appellant's activities did not meet the criteria for business auxiliary service as they did not act as an agency or commission agent and the consideration received was not linked to the sale of a product or service. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appellant was found not liable for service tax. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360158