<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1593 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272664</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petitions by directing the 2nd respondent to review the applications promptly and make decisions based on merit and legal provisions within two weeks. The court refrained from assessing the merits of the petitioners&#039; claims, emphasizing the appellate authority&#039;s jurisdiction over such matters. The judgment ordered the closure of the writ petitions without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 06:51:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1593 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272664</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petitions by directing the 2nd respondent to review the applications promptly and make decisions based on merit and legal provisions within two weeks. The court refrained from assessing the merits of the petitioners&#039; claims, emphasizing the appellate authority&#039;s jurisdiction over such matters. The judgment ordered the closure of the writ petitions without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>