<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1925 (1) TMI 3 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272654</link>
    <description>A loss caused by employee embezzlement was treated as a business loss incidental to the conduct of trade and not as capital expenditure, so it was deductible in computing business income. Boarding expenses of servants and home-travel payments were treated as expenditure incurred to retain staff and improve business efficiency, so they were admissible business allowances. In an appeal against assessment, the appellate authority&#039;s power to enhance was confined to the subject-matter of the assessment already made by the Income-tax Officer; it could not introduce and assess a new source of income, as that would amount to a fresh assessment rather than an enhancement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 1925 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2018 17:58:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1925 (1) TMI 3 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272654</link>
      <description>A loss caused by employee embezzlement was treated as a business loss incidental to the conduct of trade and not as capital expenditure, so it was deductible in computing business income. Boarding expenses of servants and home-travel payments were treated as expenditure incurred to retain staff and improve business efficiency, so they were admissible business allowances. In an appeal against assessment, the appellate authority&#039;s power to enhance was confined to the subject-matter of the assessment already made by the Income-tax Officer; it could not introduce and assess a new source of income, as that would amount to a fresh assessment rather than an enhancement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 1925 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>