<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (12) TMI 31 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272650</link>
    <description>Acceptance of costs without prejudice did not bar the revision because the applicant&#039;s reservation of rights was supported by affidavit and was not effectively rebutted. A defect in the institution and signing of a plaint by an unauthorised corporate manager was treated as curable where the company&#039;s articles authorised the manager to commence proceedings and the board later ratified the act. The Court regarded the defect as formal rather than fatal and upheld amendment of the plaint. The commentary notes that the challenge based on an alleged forged resolution was not pressed and could be raised before the trial court if advised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2018 17:44:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (12) TMI 31 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272650</link>
      <description>Acceptance of costs without prejudice did not bar the revision because the applicant&#039;s reservation of rights was supported by affidavit and was not effectively rebutted. A defect in the institution and signing of a plaint by an unauthorised corporate manager was treated as curable where the company&#039;s articles authorised the manager to commence proceedings and the board later ratified the act. The Court regarded the defect as formal rather than fatal and upheld amendment of the plaint. The commentary notes that the challenge based on an alleged forged resolution was not pressed and could be raised before the trial court if advised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>