https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272647 A quasi-judicial order refusing approval under the proviso to Section 33(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 must disclose reasons on its face. The Court held that a non-speaking order made in exercise of quasi-judicial power is vitiated and cannot be sustained. Although a later settlement between the parties made the dispute academic, it did not alter the legal principle on validity. The impugned refusal of approval was therefore invalid for want of reasons, and the appeal failed. en-us Wed, 17 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 May 2018 16:14:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272647 A quasi-judicial order refusing approval under the proviso to Section 33(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 must disclose reasons on its face. The Court held that a non-speaking order made in exercise of quasi-judicial power is vitiated and cannot be sustained. Although a later settlement between the parties made the dispute academic, it did not alter the legal principle on validity. The impugned refusal of approval was therefore invalid for want of reasons, and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272647