https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272645 Chapter IIB of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 was treated as a valid agrarian reform measure protected by Article 31A, and the second proviso to Article 31A(1) was read as referring to the ceiling limit in force when the impugned amendment operated, not an earlier superseded ceiling. The provisions were also held to fall within Article 31B because the enactments were in the Ninth Schedule. Challenges based on equality, property, religion, and related objections to family definition, clubbing of holdings, retrospective transfer cut-offs, orchard ceiling, homestead, and trust provisions were rejected as the scheme was rational, necessary for ceiling enforcement, and supported by safeguards. en-us Fri, 09 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 May 2018 16:06:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272645 Chapter IIB of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 was treated as a valid agrarian reform measure protected by Article 31A, and the second proviso to Article 31A(1) was read as referring to the ceiling limit in force when the impugned amendment operated, not an earlier superseded ceiling. The provisions were also held to fall within Article 31B because the enactments were in the Ninth Schedule. Challenges based on equality, property, religion, and related objections to family definition, clubbing of holdings, retrospective transfer cut-offs, orchard ceiling, homestead, and trust provisions were rejected as the scheme was rational, necessary for ceiling enforcement, and supported by safeguards. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272645