https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272642 A printed leaflet capable of conveying decipherable information in lasting form was treated as a "paper" within the Act and therefore had to comply with Section 3 particulars. The paper itself was required to disclose, on its face, the printer, place of printing, publisher, and place of publication; vague appearance of names without clear attribution was insufficient. Liability was not confined to the printer alone: a publisher who arranges publication of a non-complying paper may also be liable, while distributors are not treated as publishers on these facts. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 May 2018 14:24:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272642 A printed leaflet capable of conveying decipherable information in lasting form was treated as a "paper" within the Act and therefore had to comply with Section 3 particulars. The paper itself was required to disclose, on its face, the printer, place of printing, publisher, and place of publication; vague appearance of names without clear attribution was insufficient. Liability was not confined to the printer alone: a publisher who arranges publication of a non-complying paper may also be liable, while distributors are not treated as publishers on these facts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272642