<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 713 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360149</link>
    <description>The High Court interpreted Section 50C of the Act, ruling that it does not apply to the transfer of leasehold rights in land. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on its previous decisions and the Revenue&#039;s withdrawal of an appeal in a similar case due to low tax effect supported the respondent assessee&#039;s position. The judgment emphasizes the importance of legal strategy and the impact of previous decisions on tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2018 08:41:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 713 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360149</link>
      <description>The High Court interpreted Section 50C of the Act, ruling that it does not apply to the transfer of leasehold rights in land. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on its previous decisions and the Revenue&#039;s withdrawal of an appeal in a similar case due to low tax effect supported the respondent assessee&#039;s position. The judgment emphasizes the importance of legal strategy and the impact of previous decisions on tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>