<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 706 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360142</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee voluntarily disclosed the income during a survey, paid taxes before filing the return, and the omission was deemed inadvertent. The penalty notice lacked specificity on the charge, as required by law. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A) was overturned, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2018 08:41:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 706 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360142</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee voluntarily disclosed the income during a survey, paid taxes before filing the return, and the omission was deemed inadvertent. The penalty notice lacked specificity on the charge, as required by law. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A) was overturned, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>