<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 701 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360137</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the arbitral tribunal could not uphold the commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act without addressing the appellant&#039;s challenge regarding lack of notice and hearing opportunity. The Court emphasized the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing, especially after informing authorities of the company&#039;s dissolution and takeover. It was deemed crucial that the appellant be served notices and informed of hearing dates, given the transfer of liabilities from the original entity to the subsequent one. The Court set aside the challenged order, directing the appellate tribunal to reconsider the issue while ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 701 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360137</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the arbitral tribunal could not uphold the commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act without addressing the appellant&#039;s challenge regarding lack of notice and hearing opportunity. The Court emphasized the appellant&#039;s right to a fair hearing, especially after informing authorities of the company&#039;s dissolution and takeover. It was deemed crucial that the appellant be served notices and informed of hearing dates, given the transfer of liabilities from the original entity to the subsequent one. The Court set aside the challenged order, directing the appellate tribunal to reconsider the issue while ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>