https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360136 The subject goods sold under Stream 1 and Stream 2 were considered to bear a brand name and were deemed ineligible for GST exemption. The use of common/generic terms like 'Value', 'Daily', 'Superior', and 'Choice' on the package did not inherently indicate a brand name connection but needed to be assessed in conjunction with the branding and marketing environment. The judgments for both streams concluded that the goods were branded and therefore did not qualify for GST exemption. en-us Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Mar 2025 10:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360136 The subject goods sold under Stream 1 and Stream 2 were considered to bear a brand name and were deemed ineligible for GST exemption. The use of common/generic terms like 'Value', 'Daily', 'Superior', and 'Choice' on the package did not inherently indicate a brand name connection but needed to be assessed in conjunction with the branding and marketing environment. The judgments for both streams concluded that the goods were branded and therefore did not qualify for GST exemption. Case-Laws GST Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360136