https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12972 The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's ruling that the Central Government's deposit of the consideration amount with the appropriate authority was invalid. Failure to comply with the mandatory provisions of sections 269UG and 269UH led to the automatic revesting of the property in the original owners. The court emphasized the importance of strictly following statutory requirements for tendering or depositing consideration amounts. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 May 2009 16:29:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12972 The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's ruling that the Central Government's deposit of the consideration amount with the appropriate authority was invalid. Failure to comply with the mandatory provisions of sections 269UG and 269UH led to the automatic revesting of the property in the original owners. The court emphasized the importance of strictly following statutory requirements for tendering or depositing consideration amounts. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12972