<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 698 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360134</link>
    <description>HC rejected the writ petition challenging goods seizure under UP GST Act. The court determined the Assistant Commissioner had valid grounds for seizure during transportation from Delhi to Siliguri. Finding no procedural irregularities, the HC upheld the seizure order and dismissed the petition as without merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 698 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360134</link>
      <description>HC rejected the writ petition challenging goods seizure under UP GST Act. The court determined the Assistant Commissioner had valid grounds for seizure during transportation from Delhi to Siliguri. Finding no procedural irregularities, the HC upheld the seizure order and dismissed the petition as without merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>