https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360133 The High Court held that the seizure of goods under the GST Act was illegal and without jurisdiction due to the non-filling of 'Part B' of the e-way bill for intra-state transportation within 50 km. Relying on a previous court decision and government notifications, the Court directed the release of the seized goods and vehicle, setting aside the seizure order and penalty proceedings. The Court emphasized that the seizure was unjustified, aligning the judgment with precedent and ruling in favor of the petitioner. en-us Thu, 03 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360133 The High Court held that the seizure of goods under the GST Act was illegal and without jurisdiction due to the non-filling of 'Part B' of the e-way bill for intra-state transportation within 50 km. Relying on a previous court decision and government notifications, the Court directed the release of the seized goods and vehicle, setting aside the seizure order and penalty proceedings. The Court emphasized that the seizure was unjustified, aligning the judgment with precedent and ruling in favor of the petitioner. Case-Laws GST Thu, 03 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360133