<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 681 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the demand for customs duty was barred by limitation as the Customs authorities failed to initiate action within a reasonable time frame. Citing the Raj Exports case, the Tribunal found the notice for recovery of customs duty to be vague and lacking specific details, deeming it unreasonable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2018 07:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 681 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the demand for customs duty was barred by limitation as the Customs authorities failed to initiate action within a reasonable time frame. Citing the Raj Exports case, the Tribunal found the notice for recovery of customs duty to be vague and lacking specific details, deeming it unreasonable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>