<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 679 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360115</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the penalties imposed on the appellant under various provisions of the Finance Act were set aside. This decision was based on the appellant&#039;s payment of tax with interest, Tribunal directions to limit the demand, and precedents where penalties were dropped in similar cases. The Judicial Member concluded that the penalties imposed on the appellant were not sustainable in law, leading to the appeal being allowed and penalties being set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2018 06:48:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 679 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360115</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the penalties imposed on the appellant under various provisions of the Finance Act were set aside. This decision was based on the appellant&#039;s payment of tax with interest, Tribunal directions to limit the demand, and precedents where penalties were dropped in similar cases. The Judicial Member concluded that the penalties imposed on the appellant were not sustainable in law, leading to the appeal being allowed and penalties being set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>